Comparison of Limb Lengthening Methods: LON vs. Precice 2

Introduction

Choosing the right limb lengthening method is crucial for achieving your height goals and ensuring a smooth recovery process. At Become Taller Clinic, we offer two advanced limb lengthening methods: Lengthening Over Nail (LON) and Precice 2. This page provides a detailed comparison of these methods to help you make an informed decision.

Comparison Table

To give you a quick overview of the differences between the LON and Precice 2 methods, we’ve created the following comparison table:

Feature LON Method Precice 2 Method
Overview Combines external and internal fixation All-internal, magnetically controlled lengthening
Procedure Involves external fixator and internal rod Utilizes a telescopic nail controlled by an external remote
Comfort Less comfortable due to external fixator More comfortable, no external devices
Infection Risk There is a possibility that it is due to the external fixator. No infection due to all-internal approach
Cost More affordable Higher due to advanced technology
Precision Manual adjustments, less precise Highly precise, magnetically controlled
Recovery Time Longer, due to external fixator Shorter, all-internal method
Ideal Candidates Cost-conscious, can manage external fixator Seeking comfort, willing to invest in advanced method

FAQs

Q: How long does the lengthening process take with each method?

A: The lengthening process can vary, but typically it takes several months for both methods. The Precice 2 method may offer a slightly faster recovery due to the absence of an external fixator.

Q: Is one method safer than the other?

A: Both methods are safe when performed by experienced surgeons.

Q: How much does each method cost?

A: The LON method is more affordable, while the Precice 2 method is more expensive due to advanced technology. For pricing, please contact our support team.

Lengthening Over Nail (LON) Method

Overview:

  • The LON method combines both external and internal fixation. It involves the insertion of a metal rod inside the bone and the use of an external fixator.

Procedure:

  • Initial surgery to insert the internal rod and external fixator.
  • Gradual lengthening process through the external fixator.
  • Removal of the external fixator once the desired length is achieved, leaving the internal rod to stabilize the bone.

Advantages:

  • Stability: The internal rod offers additional support, reducing the risk of deformities.
  • Cost-effective: Generally less expensive than the Precice 2 method.
  • Widely used: Proven track record with many successful cases.

Disadvantages:

  • Discomfort: The external fixator can be uncomfortable and may cause scarring.
  • Infection risk: Risk of infection due to the external device.
  • Longer recovery: The presence of an external device can extend the recovery period.

Ideal Candidates:

  • Patients looking for a cost-effective solution.
  • Those who can manage the discomfort and maintenance of an external fixator.

Popularity:

  • Most people prefer the LON method due to its cost-effectiveness and proven success rate.

Precice 2 Method

Overview:

  • The Precice 2 method is an all-internal limb lengthening technique that utilizes a motorized, telescopic nail inserted into the bone. Lengthening is controlled magnetically via an external remote control.

Procedure:

  • Initial surgery to insert the telescopic nail.
  • Gradual lengthening process controlled by an external remote.
  • No external fixator is used, resulting in a more comfortable experience.

Advantages:

  • Comfort: No external devices, leading to a more comfortable and aesthetically pleasing experience.
  • Precision: Magnetically controlled lengthening allows for precise adjustments.
  • Lower infection risk: Reduced risk of infection due to the absence of an external device.
  • Faster recovery: All-internal approach often leads to quicker recovery times.

Disadvantages:

  • Cost: More expensive due to advanced technology and equipment.
  • Eligibility: Not suitable for all patients, depending on bone quality and medical history.

Ideal Candidates:

  • Patients seeking a more comfortable and less invasive experience.
  • Those willing to invest in a more advanced and precise method.
LL Surgery Packages Our Doctors