Comparison of Limb Lengthening Methods: LON vs. Precice 2
Introduction
Choosing the right limb lengthening method is crucial for achieving your height goals and ensuring a smooth recovery process. At Become Taller Clinic, we offer two advanced limb lengthening methods: Lengthening Over Nail (LON) and Precice 2. This page provides a detailed comparison of these methods to help you make an informed decision.
Comparison Table
To give you a quick overview of the differences between the LON and Precice 2 methods, we’ve created the following comparison table:
Feature | LON Method | Precice 2 Method |
---|---|---|
Overview | Combines external and internal fixation | All-internal, magnetically controlled lengthening |
Procedure | Involves external fixator and internal rod | Utilizes a telescopic nail controlled by an external remote |
Comfort | Less comfortable due to external fixator | More comfortable, no external devices |
Infection Risk | There is a possibility that it is due to the external fixator. | No infection due to all-internal approach |
Cost | More affordable | Higher due to advanced technology |
Precision | Manual adjustments, less precise | Highly precise, magnetically controlled |
Recovery Time | Longer, due to external fixator | Shorter, all-internal method |
Ideal Candidates | Cost-conscious, can manage external fixator | Seeking comfort, willing to invest in advanced method |
FAQs
Q: How long does the lengthening process take with each method?
A: The lengthening process can vary, but typically it takes several months for both methods. The Precice 2 method may offer a slightly faster recovery due to the absence of an external fixator.
Q: Is one method safer than the other?
A: Both methods are safe when performed by experienced surgeons.
Q: How much does each method cost?
A: The LON method is more affordable, while the Precice 2 method is more expensive due to advanced technology. For pricing, please contact our support team.
Lengthening Over Nail (LON) Method
Overview:
- The LON method combines both external and internal fixation. It involves the insertion of a metal rod inside the bone and the use of an external fixator.
Procedure:
- Initial surgery to insert the internal rod and external fixator.
- Gradual lengthening process through the external fixator.
- Removal of the external fixator once the desired length is achieved, leaving the internal rod to stabilize the bone.
Advantages:
- Stability: The internal rod offers additional support, reducing the risk of deformities.
- Cost-effective: Generally less expensive than the Precice 2 method.
- Widely used: Proven track record with many successful cases.
Disadvantages:
- Discomfort: The external fixator can be uncomfortable and may cause scarring.
- Infection risk: Risk of infection due to the external device.
- Longer recovery: The presence of an external device can extend the recovery period.
Ideal Candidates:
- Patients looking for a cost-effective solution.
- Those who can manage the discomfort and maintenance of an external fixator.
Popularity:
- Most people prefer the LON method due to its cost-effectiveness and proven success rate.
Precice 2 Method
Overview:
- The Precice 2 method is an all-internal limb lengthening technique that utilizes a motorized, telescopic nail inserted into the bone. Lengthening is controlled magnetically via an external remote control.
Procedure:
- Initial surgery to insert the telescopic nail.
- Gradual lengthening process controlled by an external remote.
- No external fixator is used, resulting in a more comfortable experience.
Advantages:
- Comfort: No external devices, leading to a more comfortable and aesthetically pleasing experience.
- Precision: Magnetically controlled lengthening allows for precise adjustments.
- Lower infection risk: Reduced risk of infection due to the absence of an external device.
- Faster recovery: All-internal approach often leads to quicker recovery times.
Disadvantages:
- Cost: More expensive due to advanced technology and equipment.
- Eligibility: Not suitable for all patients, depending on bone quality and medical history.
Ideal Candidates:
- Patients seeking a more comfortable and less invasive experience.
- Those willing to invest in a more advanced and precise method.